I do not agree that the Harry Potter books had been written in a bad manner. However I had thought that they had been written in a simple manner. One that would be simple for the audience it had been written for to read. That does not equate to a bad manner of writing to me.

Furthermore the comparison of the Lord of the Rings and the Harry Potter books do bother me. I have thought that this comparison has often been due to the fact that the Lord of the Rings fans feel that the series is in competition with Harry Potter, which it is not as it is different all together.

The Lord of the Rings is not boring but I have found that it had been hard to read through the books again. It is an interesting book and I had thought that it had been one of the better series I have read but once I had read them all, I have not found the need to read through them again. It is true that a book has to have good descriptions as well as depth and a good plot, but there is such a thing as too much description. Being much too detailed can be rather distracting in a story especially if what you are describing is insignificant. I am not saying this is the case with the Lord of the Rings trilogy but it does exist.

_________________
<IMG SRC="http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s128/Aerlinniel/fine.jpg">