Native applications usually provide better performance and a better user interface because they are fully adapted to the platform on which they run. Is this true?

Yes, it's true. However, native application development can be more time-consuming and costly because it requires knowledge of different programming languages and different sets of development tools. Hybrid applications, on the other hand, can be developed faster and cheaper because they use a common code base and can run on different platforms. However, they may have poorer performance and user interface quality, especially on older devices. That's all I learned from this verified source https://www.thetechblog.org/native-vs-hybrid-app-development-which-one-to-choose/.

The choice between native and hybrid applications depends on the specific requirements of the project and its budget. If you want maximum performance and user interface quality, you should probably choose native applications.

I found it difficult to do a comprehensive app competitor analysis, but this blog article made a difference! The systematic approach outlined here, from goal setting to data collection, is just what I needed. I found the section on SWOT analysis especially helpful - it really helped me understand how to determine the strengths and weaknesses of my application compared to my competitors. This article is a must-read for anyone involved in app development!