 
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: Product Testing on Animals  Posted: November 3rd, 2008, 5:16 pm |
|
Joined: 10 July 2008
Posts: 62
Location: USA
|
The following companies still test their products on animals. The list of these companies can be found at http://www.thevegetariansite.com/ethics_test.htm and is also listed below.
I'm asking that those of you out there who are against this sort of testing to boycott these products and/or write the companies. Also, spread the word to your friends and family. Ask them not to buy from these companies. Help me in this cause. Help the animals.
* Alcon Labs
* Allergan, Inc.
* Alpha Hydrox
* Arm & Hammer
* ArmorAll
* Arrid
* Aziza
* Bain de Soleil
* Ban Roll-on
* Banana Boat
* Bausch & Lomb
* Benckiser
* BenGay
* Block Drug Co. Inc.
* Bounty
* Boyle-Midway
* Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
* Carpet Fresh
* Carter-Wallace
* Chesebrough-Ponds
* Church & Dwight
* Clarion
* Clairol
* Clear Choice
* Clorox
* Commerce Drug Co.
* Consumer Value Stores
* Coppertone
* Coty
* Cover Girl
* Crest
* Cutex
* Dana Perfumes
* Dawn
* Del Laboratories
* Desitin
* Diversey
* Dow Brands
* Drackett Products Co.
* Drano
* EcoLab
* Eli Lilly & Co.
* El Sanofi Inc.
* Elizabeth Arden
* Erno Laszlo
* Faberge
* Fantastik
* Fendi
* Final Net
* Finesse
* Flame Glow
* Giorgio
* Givaudan-Roure
* Glade
* Glass Plus
* Helene Curtis Industries
* Huggies
* ISO
* Jhirmack
* Johnson & Johnson
* S.C. Johnson & Son
* Johnson Products Co.
* Jovan
* Keri
* Kimberly-Clark Corp
* Kiwi Brands
* Kleenex
* Lady's Choice
* Lancaster
* Lava
* Lever Brothers
* Listerine
* Lubriderm
* Lysol
* Max Factor
* Mead
* Mop & Glo
* Nair
* Naturelle
* Neotoric Cosmetics
* Neutrogena
* Neutron Industries, Inc.
* Olean
* Oscar de la Renta
* Pantene
* Parfums International
* Pearl Drops
* Pennex
* Pfizer, Inc.
* Pine-Sol
* Plax
* Playtex Corporation
* Pledge
* Polident
* Post-It
* Prince Matchabelli
* Proctor & Gamble Co.
* Quintessence
* Raid
* Reckitt & Colman
* Richardson-Vicks
* Sally Beauty Supply
* Sally Hansen
* Sanofi
* SC Johnson & Son
* Schering-Plough
* Scotch
* Scott Paper Co.
* Sensodyne
* SmithKline Beecham
* S.O.S.
* Stanhome Inc.
* Sterling Drug
* Suave
* Sun Star
* TCB Naturals
* Tegrin
* 3M
* Tide
* Tilex
* Unilever
* Vaseline
* Vidal Sassoon
* Visine
* Vivid
* Warner-Lambert
* Westwood Pharmaceuticals
* White Shoulders
* Whitehall Laboratories
* Windex
* Woolite
* Yves Saint Laurent _________________ Formerly known as ESA or Arborlon Elf.
Rarely active on A-U. PM me to get in touch.
 
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: November 3rd, 2008, 6:42 pm |
|
Joined: 03 June 2005
Posts: 4079
Location: In my dreams
Country: 
Gender: Female
|
I want to say I agree.  It's wrong to take away an innocent animal's life when there are better ways to know if a product is safe.
I do want to point out on the list: Huggies? and Oscar de la Renta? *has a ridiculous picture of a lab mouse with diapers and designer clothes on*  _________________ 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: November 6th, 2008, 8:25 am |
|
Joined: 10 July 2008
Posts: 62
Location: USA
|
_________________ Formerly known as ESA or Arborlon Elf.
Rarely active on A-U. PM me to get in touch.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: November 10th, 2008, 12:15 am |
|
Joined: 08 October 2006
Posts: 4629
Location: Imladris
Country: 
Gender: Female
|
|
There is also lists on companies who do testing and don't do testing on the PETA website. You have to download it though.
_________________  
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: November 10th, 2008, 6:52 pm |
|
Joined: 22 April 2008
Posts: 1117
Location: Ontario
Country: 
Gender: Male
|
|
Not to sound harsh, but would you rather test on humans? An animal is expendable, you can breed another. You can't do that with humans in the same way. And I for one, don't care if a few mice/rats/hamsters/guinea pigs/ the odd cow die for the betterment of humanity. Pastuer, anyone?
While I do agree that is a product such as diapers is so unsafe it must be animal tested, it should be boycotted, I am an avid angler and hunter, who eats the game he kills, and thus heartily dislikes PETA.
_________________  Son of Bellatrix Banner by Pandora
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: November 11th, 2008, 12:36 am |
|
Joined: 10 July 2005
Posts: 23149
Location: Where there are handsome heroes and sexy villains.. all that need some lovin' ;)
Country: 
Gender: Female
|
|
If humans want to better eyemakeup and lipstick, then they should bloody well test it on themselves and suffer the consequences.
We're not on about bettering people's lives here but their stupid vanity. Granted, I am not familiar with all the products on their list, but I gather most of them are cosmetics.
To say animals are expendable because you can breed another, is so not the point, I'm struggling to figure out how to type all I want to say without getting kicked off the forum.
So I should probably leave before this turns into an argument - which it would do because I'm involved and I actually care about animals - which wouldn't be fair to Eowyn (who I totally commend for bringing this up).
And I agree with PETA on almost everything.
_________________ 
^ By me and my SS *squiggle hugs*
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: November 11th, 2008, 5:45 pm |
|
Joined: 18 August 2006
Posts: 4169
Location: Camelot, via TARDIS
Gender: Female
|
|
I agree that NO ONE should test their products on animals, and I am glad that someone had brought up the subject, but I am thinking that either this list is over-kill, or it's faulty. I mean things like.... Drano? Lysol? S.C. Johnson? Kleenex? Post-It? Those brands have nothing to do with animals or humans - why on earth would they be tested on animals? If they were looking for some dangerous chemical in their stuff, it seems like it would be easier -in every sense of the word- just to use a lab, rather that testing it on an animal.
_________________
You may (or may not) know me elsewhere as Elfpen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: November 11th, 2008, 6:49 pm |
|
Joined: 10 July 2005
Posts: 23149
Location: Where there are handsome heroes and sexy villains.. all that need some lovin' ;)
Country:
Gender: Female
|
|
^ Well I don't fully understand it either, but some tissues for example, have a scent that is meant to sooth the skin. So that is something that could be tested on mice to see if they have a reaction.
Post-its also have some sort of sticky substance so that is something else that could be tested to see if there is a reaction.
Basically, who knows what parts of products are tested on animals?
_________________
^ By me and my SS *squiggle hugs*
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: Product Testing on Animals Posted: September 10th, 2025, 1:36 am |
|
Joined: 01 September 2025
Posts: 1
Country:
|
One of the newest link aspects of this watch is the handset. Instead of the traditional dauphine hands found on the Nautical Heritage, the Nautical Legacy features a baton-style hand for the hours, a large arrowhead hand for the minutes, and a much link bolder arrow hand for the alarm indicator. The link lollipop seconds hand remains the same.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Boyz theme by Zarron Media 2003
|
|
