Rules      FAQ       Register        Login
It is currently July 23rd, 2025, 7:27 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 13th, 2005, 12:14 pm 
Mageling
Mageling
User avatar

Joined: 03 July 2005
Posts: 9846
Location: city that never sleeps

Offline
he already wrote the Eldest, he just hasn't released it yet. which REALLY makes me mad...

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 13th, 2005, 5:02 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 14 June 2005
Posts: 8567
Location: Missoula, Montana
Country: United States (us)
Gender: Female

Offline
Lady Dark Moon wrote:
he already wrote the Eldest, he just hasn't released it yet. which REALLY makes me mad...

Well it comes out August 23, I believe!

_________________
"So what? So plenty!"

Image
Sig: Teh Nurr

I've met Eru & Eä & Ellie & teh Arweb & Naur & Elenya & POTR!

POLKA WILL NEVER DIE!




Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 15th, 2005, 8:12 pm 
Ringwraith
Ringwraith
User avatar

Joined: 04 June 2005
Posts: 1505
Location: California
Country: United States (us)

Offline
Larien wrote:
:bye2: I guess I'll submit my opinion too, not that I expect anyone to agree with me...but everyone's entitled to their own opinions right?
Sida will tell you that when I read Eragon I complained about it the entire time. I thought that it was too conventional, too predictable. I thought that the writing was OK, but I certainly commend Christopher Paolini for getting published at such a young age. It's very hard and time-consuming to write something of that length.


Of course, everyone is allowed to express their opinions, just as long as if it's not about politics and that it's stated in a polite fashion. :)

I actually very much agree with you. It was alright, astonishing for such a young author, but not one of my favorite books. :bye2:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 16th, 2005, 9:04 pm 
Mageling
Mageling
User avatar

Joined: 03 July 2005
Posts: 9846
Location: city that never sleeps

Offline
its plot was a bit too simple and straightforward and the battle at the end wasn't the MOST exciting battle I've ever read about. he's probably just a little young, he got it published because his parents own the publishing company

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 19th, 2005, 11:25 pm 
Hobbit
Hobbit

Joined: 21 June 2005
Posts: 31
Location: USA

Offline
I really enjoyed Eragon when I read it a little over two years ago. It was one of those books that I couldn't stop reading. I reread it once, and I'm looking forward to Eldest.

But although I did enjoy it, I"ll be the first to admit that it wasn't the best book ever. Certainly not one of my favorites. It was very predictable. And I do mean very.

But I do think that it is impressive that he wrote it at such a young age.

_________________
Snack Fairy!


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 4th, 2005, 10:58 pm 
Futon-Revolutionist
Futon-Revolutionist

Joined: 07 July 2005
Posts: 15169

Offline
*Looks down at the many stakes protruding from his chest* As it could have been gathered from my original name(Eragonshadeslayer) I adore Eragon. Even the 5th time I read it, the book grabbed me and didnt let go. Even though it was originally published by his, parents' company, it is now being published by a division of Random House, Inc. Any book that can knock Harry Potter *Washes mouth out* out of the number one spot is better than average.


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 5th, 2005, 5:01 pm 
Ringwraith
Ringwraith
User avatar

Joined: 04 June 2005
Posts: 1505
Location: California
Country: United States (us)

Offline
Aragorn wrote:
*Looks down at the many stakes protruding from his chest* As it could have been gathered from my original name(Eragonshadeslayer) I adore Eragon. Even the 5th time I read it, the book grabbed me and didnt let go. Even though it was originally published by his, parents' company, it is now being published by a division of Random House, Inc. Any book that can knock Harry Potter *Washes mouth out* out of the number one spot is better than average.


Oh - you changed your name??? I didn't know that . . .

Anyway, I think everyone is basically saying the same thing - how it wasn't the best book ever, how it was actually pretty predictable, and how it was still quite impressive that the author wrote that at such a young age. I think we've all come to an agreement here. :bye2:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 5th, 2005, 11:42 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 03 June 2005
Posts: 1770
Location: at the computer

Offline
Agreement? That's a bit... I guess hasty, of you.

Okay, so I agree that I've read books that have technically been better, but I thought that it was a really good book. I thought it was well written, and it had some lines in it that really made me think. (Like the one about how dying for your beliefs is easy - it's living and suffering for them that's the hard thing.)

I also didn't think it was predictable. Certainly, there was an element of predictablity about it, but there is that about every book unless it is amazingly brilliant (even some aspects of the latest HP were predictable). It was a fantasy, and fantasies do tend to follow certain... formula.

Also, the characters and how they respond were realistic. I still think Arya's rescue and her response were realistic, and not degrading to women. She's a better swordsman than Eragon, she attacked him mentally... and any male in that situation would have equally required resucing. Eragon just wouldn't have responded with the same desire to rescue... and there's half the plot gone. If we're are picking on the "damsel in distress" theme, I think women are entitled to be a damsel in distress if they want to... as long as they can look after themselves.

_________________
<center>i love
doctor who
Image
support Arwen!
[+~^$#?]
</center>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 7th, 2005, 12:46 pm 
Futon-Revolutionist
Futon-Revolutionist

Joined: 07 July 2005
Posts: 15169

Offline
Herenya wrote:
Agreement? That's a bit... I guess hasty, of you.

Okay, so I agree that I've read books that have technically been better, but I thought that it was a really good book. I thought it was well written, and it had some lines in it that really made me think. (Like the one about how dying for your beliefs is easy - it's living and suffering for them that's the hard thing.)

I also didn't think it was predictable. Certainly, there was an element of predictablity about it, but there is that about every book unless it is amazingly brilliant (even some aspects of the latest HP were predictable). It was a fantasy, and fantasies do tend to follow certain... formula.

Also, the characters and how they respond were realistic. I still think Arya's rescue and her response were realistic, and not degrading to women. She's a better swordsman than Eragon, she attacked him mentally... and any male in that situation would have equally required resucing. Eragon just wouldn't have responded with the same desire to rescue... and there's half the plot gone. If we're are picking on the "damsel in distress" theme, I think women are entitled to be a damsel in distress if they want to... as long as they can look after themselves.


I am in 180% agreement with Herenya :bounce:


Last edited by tim4x on August 8th, 2005, 9:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 7th, 2005, 2:36 pm 
Mageling
Mageling
User avatar

Joined: 03 July 2005
Posts: 9846
Location: city that never sleeps

Offline
someone told me it was coming out today :confused:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 8th, 2005, 2:55 am 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 03 June 2005
Posts: 1770
Location: at the computer

Offline
No, not today. Worse luck. :) August 23rd, I think.

_________________
<center>i love
doctor who
Image
support Arwen!
[+~^$#?]
</center>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 8th, 2005, 10:25 am 
Elf
Elf
User avatar

Joined: 04 June 2005
Posts: 1170
Location: Out of my Mind

Offline
I just finished reading Eragon and I'm just 'meh' about the book. :confused: As many people already posted, it wasn't terribly original (reminded me very much like books near to my heart), and I agree. I thought the plot was kinda predictable. But that's not why I didn't like the book that much. The things that probably annoyed me the most were the stereotypes (they made me want to bang my head against the wall!) and the lack of character development. I thought that Eragon reminded me of a superhero, I mean, he has a dragon, can do magic, in only a couple months becomes one of the greatest swordsmen (but faints or get knocks out during many encounters :annoyed2: ), does archery, ect. I never really got to love him in the 450+ pages. He annoyed me too much. :bones: The only character I probably liked was Saphira and the werecat. I thought the middle of the book was better, but had a bad ending. Overall it was OK for me. That's my opinion. :bye:

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 8th, 2005, 8:47 pm 
Ringwraith
Ringwraith
User avatar

Joined: 04 June 2005
Posts: 1505
Location: California
Country: United States (us)

Offline
Herenya wrote:
Agreement? That's a bit... I guess hasty, of you.

Okay, so I agree that I've read books that have technically been better, but I thought that it was a really good book. I thought it was well written, and it had some lines in it that really made me think. (Like the one about how dying for your beliefs is easy - it's living and suffering for them that's the hard thing.)

I also didn't think it was predictable. Certainly, there was an element of predictablity about it, but there is that about every book unless it is amazingly brilliant (even some aspects of the latest HP were predictable). It was a fantasy, and fantasies do tend to follow certain... formula.

Also, the characters and how they respond were realistic. I still think Arya's rescue and her response were realistic, and not degrading to women. She's a better swordsman than Eragon, she attacked him mentally... and any male in that situation would have equally required resucing. Eragon just wouldn't have responded with the same desire to rescue... and there's half the plot gone. If we're are picking on the "damsel in distress" theme, I think women are entitled to be a damsel in distress if they want to... as long as they can look after themselves.


Mmmm . . . yes, that was hasty of me - especially considering how other people will be posting here too with new, original opinions. . . sorry!! :blush:

Well, I'm not one to make much of a judgement - I read the book months ago, with many other books in between, so I don't remember all of it. :bye2:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 10th, 2005, 12:39 am 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2087
Location: The Treasure State
Country: Morocco (ma)
Gender: Female

Offline
~Tigging with Dom~ wrote:
I just finished reading Eragon and I'm just 'meh' about the book. :confused: As many people already posted, it wasn't terribly original (reminded me very much like books near to my heart), and I agree. I thought the plot was kinda predictable. But that's not why I didn't like the book that much. The things that probably annoyed me the most were the stereotypes (they made me want to bang my head against the wall!) and the lack of character development. I thought that Eragon reminded me of a superhero, I mean, he has a dragon, can do magic, in only a couple months becomes one of the greatest swordsmen (but faints or get knocks out during many encounters :annoyed2: ), does archery, ect. I never really got to love him in the 450+ pages. He annoyed me too much. :bones: The only character I probably liked was Saphira and the werecat. I thought the middle of the book was better, but had a bad ending. Overall it was OK for me. That's my opinion. :bye:


Hehe, I agree, Sometimes, Eragon's shall we say...cockyness, really got to me. But, I viewed him as a troubled teen :p I definitely didn't fall in love with him :p... Angela is my absolute favorite character! Woo! Go Angela!

_________________
Image

Image

[Will accept any PM! So PM me! :teehee:]


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 10th, 2005, 11:38 am 
Futon-Revolutionist
Futon-Revolutionist

Joined: 07 July 2005
Posts: 15169

Offline
I WANT A WERECAT!!!!!!!!!!! Ok, I'm feeling better now...


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: August 16th, 2005, 11:32 pm 
Istari
Istari
User avatar

Joined: 13 August 2005
Posts: 2567
Location: Michigan

Offline
I really liked Eragon. But did anyone else feel like it was a fantasy version of Star Wars? The whole thing with Galbatorix being a powerful Dragon Rider gone bad, killing all the good Riders, and then setting himself up to be a dictator reminded me of Revenge of the Sith with Anakin Skywalker. I just thought that was funny. Great minds think alike...

_________________
<center>
Image
Image
</center>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Boyz theme by Zarron Media 2003